Only on the Journal Online...

Speak Out!

The official soapbox of the Northwest suburbs.


Sports


Travel


Photo Reprints


Movie Scene


AdsPlus


Obituaries


Photo Galleries

Local Graduations
Memorial Day
Election Night
Maine Twp. vs. Rockford Hockey
Pizza Contest!
Wheeling Wins Super-Sectional
Maine East International Celebration
Travel - Banff, Alberta, Canada
The Great Flood of 2008
Holiday Homes

Travel Guides

Wisconsin: Great Vacations
Michigan: Great Vacations
Florida: Great Vacations
Quad Cities: Great Vacations
Wisconsin Dells: Great Vacations

Story posted Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Village Reviewing, Redrafting Pet Codes

By RICHARD MAYER Assistant Managing Editor

Mt. Prospect elected officials Tuesday night discussed cleaning up or updating language in village code that speaks to limitations on cats and dogs.

Board members and staff decided to look at the issue following recent controversy the Village of Wheeling experienced over the number of cats and/or dogs that could legally be maintained in a residence.

"After what happened in Wheeling, we looked at our codes and realized they were similar to Wheeling's, so we decided to redraft it to make it clearer," said Village Manager Michael Janonis.

According to village code, no more than three dogs, cats, or combination older than 12 weeks may be kept, maintained, and/or harbored in any dwelling unit. The only exception to the code would be if an individual possesses a business license to sell pets, or provide veterinary or animal hospital services.

Village Attorney Buzz Hill said the village prohibits most other animals in the village.

"The way the ordinance is worded, it's geared toward keeping pets (dogs and cats) inside the house," said Hill. "The concern is what if someone keeps a pet outside the house---is that considered one of three?  We need to make sure both situations are covered."

The other main issue deals with language in the current ordinance that suggests there is a possibility of operating kennels or a vet office in residential areas.

The board asked Hill to review the ordinance and clean up the language so the law is precise in the future.

The board is expected to approve the updated ordinance on Tuesday, June 16.

Back to top

Back to Journal homepage

Speak Out!
Comments are edited first by Journal staff before running in print and appearing online.